By Tom Hals
March 6 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge will meet behind closed doors with government lawyers on Friday seeking to hammer out a process to refund up to $166 billion in illegally collected tariffs, a meeting a court official described as a “settlement conference.”
Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade will meet with lawyers representing the customs agency responsible for reimbursing more than 300,000 importers that paid the tariffs, which were struck down last month as unconstitutional.
Just as the meeting was scheduled to start, a top customs official informed the court that his agency was unable to comply with the judge’s directive earlier this week to use its existing system to generate automatic tariff refunds. Businesses have raised concerns about what they expect to be a months- or years-long process to get refunds.
U.S. courts are presumed to be open to the public, although judges will sometimes hold private meetings with parties to discuss scheduling or how to handle sensitive information.
The calendar on the court’s website describes Friday’s meeting as a “closed conference.” When asked why the meeting was closed to the public, Gina Justice, the clerk for the trade court, told Reuters on Thursday that it was a “settlement conference.”
CREATING A REFUND PROCESS
The case that Eaton is overseeing to create a refund process was brought by a single importer, Atmus Filtration, which said in a court filing it had paid $11 million in illegal tariffs.
Atmus’ lawyers will be able to attend Friday’s meeting remotely, according to the court docket. They and the agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), did not respond to requests for comment.
It is unclear why the Atmus case, which was filed last week, became the vehicle that may determine how to litigate the tariff refunds for around 2,000 cases.
The judge, who said he was chosen by the court to hear those cases, said he wanted a process that would not require going to court.
Eaton issued a sweeping order on Wednesday in the Atmus case directing the CBP to begin refunding illegally collected tariffs to potentially hundreds of thousands of importers using the agency’s existing internal process. The order made clear that it applied to all importers, not just Atmus.
However, in a Friday court filing, Brandon Lord, a top CBP official, said his agency couldn’t meet the judge’s demand. “CBP is now facing an unprecedented volume of refunds. Its existing administrative procedures and technology are not well-suited to a task of this scale and will require manual work that will prevent personnel from fully carrying out the agency’s trade enforcement mission,” Lord said in the court filing.
He said 330,000 importers had paid $166 billion in tariffs on 53 million shipments.
TARIFFS RULED ILLEGAL IN FEBRUARY
A broad swath of Trump’s tariffs was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled on February 20 that Trump had exceeded his authority, upending a key plank of his economic policy. The court did not provide guidance on refunds, a process that dissenting Justice Brett Kavanaugh warned could be a “mess.”
The vast majority of importers are small businesses, and many worry that the refund process will be costly and distracting.
Eaton said he expected CBP lawyers to attend Friday’s 10:30 a.m. ET (1530 GMT) meeting, which he called a conference, to resolve how to cut through paperwork and issue refunds.
“I don’t believe that any of this has to be chaotic with respect to anybody, because I know that you’re going to try to come up with a way of doing it,” Eaton said at Wednesday’s hearing. “And so on Friday, we’re going to hear at least the initial ideas from the customs service as to how this will proceed.”
An attorney involved with other trade refund cases told Reuters they believed the meeting would result in a process that would be made public as soon as Friday that would provide relatively quick refunds for the vast majority of importers without the need to sue.
Cases by importers, such as VOS Selections and Learning Resources, were filed early in 2025 and went all the way to the Supreme Court. The legal team for VOS Selections and several other importers had asked the judges handling their cases to transfer them to Eaton, although the court has not taken action.
(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Dan Burns, William Mallard and David Gaffen)
