By Jana Winter
April 20 (Reuters) – FBI Director Kash Patel filed a defamation lawsuit against the Atlantic and its reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick following the publication of an article on Friday alleging the director had a drinking problem that could pose a threat to national security.
The magazine’s story, initially titled “Kash Patel’s Erratic Behavior Could Cost Him His Job,” cited more than two dozen anonymous sources expressing concern about Patel’s “conspicuous inebriation and unexplained absences” that “alarmed officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice.”
The article, which the Atlantic subsequently titled “The FBI Director Is MIA” in its online version, reported that during Patel’s tenure, the FBI had to reschedule early meetings “as a result of his alcohol-fueled nights” and that Patel “is often away or unreachable, delaying time-sensitive decisions needed to advance investigations.”
In the Atlantic’s story, the White House, the Department of Justice and Patel denied the allegations. The article included a statement from the FBI attributed to Patel, “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court—bring your checkbook.”
“The Atlantic’s story is a lie,” Patel said in an interview with Reuters. “They were given the truth before they published, and they chose to print falsehoods anyway.”
“We stand by our reporting on Kash Patel, and we will vigorously defend the Atlantic and our journalists against this meritless lawsuit,” the Atlantic said in a statement.
Reuters could not independently establish the accuracy of the article or why the publication changed the title.
Patel’s complaint says that while the Atlantic is free to criticize the leadership of the FBI, “they crossed the legal line” by publishing an article “replete with false and obviously fabricated allegations designed to destroy Director Patel’s reputation and drive him from office.”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeks $250 million in damages.
The lawsuit alleges the Atlantic ignored the FBI’s denials and did not respond to a Friday letter from Patel’s lawyer Jesse Binnall to senior editors and the Atlantic’s legal department asking for more time to refute the 19 allegations the reporter told the FBI’s press office she would be publishing.
The letter, which Reuters has seen, was sent shortly before 4 p.m. on Friday and the Atlantic published the story at 6:20 p.m., according to the complaint. Reuters could not establish how or if the Atlantic responded to Binnall’s request.
The lawsuit alleges the publication acted with “actual malice,” a legal standard that requires public figures such as Patel to show the publisher knowingly printed false information or recklessly ignored doubts about its accuracy.
“Defendants’ conscious decision to ignore the detailed, specific, and substantive refutations in the Pre-Publication Letter, and their refusal to give a reasonable amount of time for the FBI and Director Patel to respond, is among the strongest possible evidence of actual malice,” the lawsuit says.
The Supreme Court has set a high bar for defamation claims that requires a public figures like Patel to prove that the Atlantic, or its reporter, knew its reporting was false and published it anyway.
“It’s a heavy hill to climb to prove actual malice,” said Deanne Schullman, a media lawyer with Shullman Fugate PLLC in Florida, adding that she believes the suit has a little chance of succeeding. “A failure to obtain comment from the other side alone is not sufficient to establish actual malice.”
Binnall is a prominent Republican attorney who has represented U.S. President Donald Trump in numerous civil cases including one brought by U.S. Capitol Police officers over his role in the January 6 riots. He represented Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., former national security adviser Mike Flynn, and ran Trump’s challenge to Nevada’s 2020 election results.
The lawsuit is the latest instance of a Trump administration figure suing a media outlet. A judge dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against CNN for describing election denialism as “the big lie.” Judges also dismissed Trump’s lawsuits against the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Trump has refiled his lawsuit against the New York Times and may refile against the Wall Street Journal.
He has also secured some settlements. ABC News agreed to settle a case for $15 million plus $1 million in legal fees. Paramount Global agreed to pay $16 million to settle a dispute over what the Trump administration called “deceptive editing” of a CBS News interview with his opponent in the 2024 election, Kamala Harris.
(Reporting by Jana Winter in Washington; Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Michael Learmonth, Lisa Shumaker and Alistair Bell)
